You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tracking health commodity inventory and notifying stock levels via mobile devices: a mixed methods systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012907.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Smisha Agarwal, Claire Glenton, Nicholas Henschke, Tigest Tamrat, Hanna Bergman, Marita S Fønhus, Garrett L Mehl, Simon Lewin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 87 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,610,741
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,274
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,338
of 441,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.