↓ Skip to main content

Urgent‐start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional‐start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urgent‐start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional‐start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012913.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Carmel M Hawley, Yeoungjee Cho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Lecturer 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 41 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 47 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,732,627
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,409
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,167
of 518,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.