You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012946.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicolás Kahuam-López, Alejandro Navas, Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Antonio Ibarra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | 25% |
Ecuador | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 50 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 31% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 56 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,510,086
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,012
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,451
of 400,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.