↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013002.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Ni hIci, Henry Mp Boardman, Kamran Baig, Jody L Stafford, Cristina Cernei, Owen Bodger, Stephen Westaby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 12%
Other 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 73 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 81 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,414,324
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,193
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,312
of 433,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.