You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Advance care planning for heart failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013022 |
Authors |
Yuri Nishikawa, Hiroki Fukahori, Erika Ota, Atsushi Mizuno, Natsuko Hiroyama, Mitsunori Miyashita, Daisuke Yoneoka, Joey SW Kwong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 25% |
Spain | 3 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
Psychology | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,614,558
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,896
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,552
of 339,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.