You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013040 |
| Authors |
Narelle S Cox, Christine F McDonald, Catherine J Hill, Paul O'Halloran, Jennifer A Alison, Paolo Zanaboni, Heather Macdonald, Anne E Holland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 25% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,776,851
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,032
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,914
of 343,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.