You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paracetamol, NSAIDS and opioid analgesics for chronic low back pain: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013045 |
| Authors |
Matthew K Bagg, Andrew J McLachlan, Christopher G Maher, Steven J Kamper, Christopher M Williams, Nicholas Henschke, Benedict M Wand, G L Moseley, Markus Hübscher, Neil E O'Connell, Maurits W van Tulder, Adriani Nikolakopoulou, James H McAuley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,727,190
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,299
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,077
of 342,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.