You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013135.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carol Rivas, Carol Vigurs, Jacqui Cameron, Lucia Yeo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 27 | 35% |
Australia | 7 | 9% |
Ireland | 4 | 5% |
France | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
New Zealand | 3 | 4% |
Malawi | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 60% |
Scientists | 23 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 824 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 824 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 124 | 15% |
Researcher | 91 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 90 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 6% |
Other | 124 | 15% |
Unknown | 288 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 113 | 14% |
Psychology | 93 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 65 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 14 | 2% |
Other | 85 | 10% |
Unknown | 312 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#693,251
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,290
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,923
of 365,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.