↓ Skip to main content

A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
76 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
830 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013135.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Rivas, Carol Vigurs, Jacqui Cameron, Lucia Yeo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 830 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 830 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 15%
Student > Bachelor 91 11%
Researcher 90 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 6%
Other 131 16%
Unknown 287 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 113 14%
Psychology 94 11%
Social Sciences 66 8%
Sports and Recreations 14 2%
Other 91 11%
Unknown 311 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#704,381
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,314
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,101
of 366,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.