↓ Skip to main content

A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
77 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
824 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013135.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Rivas, Carol Vigurs, Jacqui Cameron, Lucia Yeo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 824 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 824 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 15%
Researcher 91 11%
Student > Bachelor 90 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 6%
Other 124 15%
Unknown 288 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 113 14%
Psychology 93 11%
Social Sciences 65 8%
Sports and Recreations 14 2%
Other 85 10%
Unknown 312 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#693,251
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,290
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,923
of 365,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.