You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013163.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vishal Kapoor, Manoj N Malviya, Roger Soll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Russia | 1 | 10% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 327 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 20% |
| Unknown | 127 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 141 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,158,147
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,496
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,702
of 366,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.