↓ Skip to main content

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Daniel Saleh, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Lopa Patel, Rubeta N Matin, Colette O'Sullivan, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 239 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 12 5%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 92 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Psychology 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 102 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,237
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,682
of 450,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.