You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perioperative antibiotics for preventing post‐surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013209.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Chan, Samantha Ng, Hooi P Chan, Elaine M Pascoe, Elliott Geoffrey Playford, Germaine Wong, Jeremy R Chapman, Wai H Lim, Ross S Francis, Nicole M Isbel, Scott B Campbell, Carmel M Hawley, David W Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,672,298
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,665
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,075
of 427,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.