↓ Skip to main content

Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non‐invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013231.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Moresco, Olga Romantsik, Maria Grazia Calevo, Matteo Bruschettini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Master 17 8%
Other 13 6%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 90 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 97 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,572,011
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,396
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,585
of 403,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.