You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dressings and topical agents for the management of open wounds after surgical treatment for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013439 |
| Authors |
Philip J Herrod, Brett Doleman, Edward J Hardy, Paul Hardy, Trevor Maloney, John P Williams, Jon N Lund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,984,755
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,810
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,763
of 358,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.