You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013503 |
Authors |
Nathan Davies, Yolanda Barrado‐Martin, Greta Rait, Akiko Fukui, Bridget Candy, Christina H Smith, Jill Manthorpe, Kirsten J Moore, Victoria Vickerstaff, Elizabeth L Sampson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 64% |
New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Psychology | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,641,910
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,071
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,828
of 478,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.