↓ Skip to main content

Coronary artery bypass surgery versus medical therapy alone for ischaemic heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus medical therapy alone for ischaemic heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013645
Authors

Long Zuo, Xin Yue, Tao Bian, Yiqun Cai, Licheng Wang, Linmiao Zeng, Hongmei He, Linning Wang, Adam Ioannou, Shaoke Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,630
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,540
of 434,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.