| Title |
Prophylactic anticoagulants for people hospitalised with COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald Lg Flumignan, Jéssica Dantas de Sá Tinôco, Patricia If Pascoal, Libnah L Areias, Marcelly S Cossi, Maria Icd Fernandes, Isabelle Kf Costa, Larissa Souza, Charbel F Matar, Britta Tendal, Virginia Fm Trevisani, Álvaro N Atallah, Luis Cu Nakano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
| United States | 11 | 9% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 10% |
| Scientists | 5 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 362 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 12% |
| Unknown | 156 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Unknown | 165 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#366,609
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#623
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,887
of 434,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.