You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000003.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vittorio Demicheli, Carlo Di Pietrantonj |
| Abstract |
Grant giving relies heavily on peer review for the assessment of the quality of proposals but the evidence of effects of these procedures is scarce. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#717,251
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,336
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,165
of 87,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.