| Title |
Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000006.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Kettle, Therese Dowswell, Khaled MK Ismail |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 65 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 76 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,363,297
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,295
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,353
of 96,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.