↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000028.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijaya M Musini, Aaron M Tejani, Ken Bassett, James M Wright

Abstract

Elevated blood pressure (known as hypertension) increases with age, and most rapidly over age 60. Systolic hypertension is more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease than diastolic hypertension, and occurs more commonly in older people. It is important to know the benefits and harms of antihypertensive treatment of hypertension in this age group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 214 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 58 26%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 44 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,544,187
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,297
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,442
of 106,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.