Title |
Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000078.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zarko Alfirevic, Stephen J Milan, Stefania Livio |
Abstract |
Planned caesarean delivery for women thought be in preterm labour may be protective for baby, but could also be quite traumatic for both mother and baby. The optimal mode of delivery of preterm babies for both cephalic and breech presentation remains, therefore, controversial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 30% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 433 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 56 | 13% |
Researcher | 44 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 9% |
Other | 28 | 6% |
Other | 89 | 20% |
Unknown | 122 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 183 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
Psychology | 12 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
Other | 34 | 8% |
Unknown | 136 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,381,611
of 25,504,429 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,959
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,010
of 211,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,504,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.