↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home-based social support for socially disadvantaged mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Home-based social support for socially disadvantaged mothers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1999
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen D Hodnett, Ian Roberts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Unspecified 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Unspecified 7 12%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2009.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,077
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,104
of 99,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.