Title |
Maternal nutrient supplementation for suspected impaired fetal growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000148 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lale Say, A Metin Gülmezoglu, G Justus Hofmeyr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
Researcher | 17 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 20% |
Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,746,060
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,134
of 12,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,611
of 129,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.