| Title |
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000254.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer R Evans, John G Lawrenson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 3 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 73% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,419,744
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,980
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,217
of 355,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.