| Title |
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000270.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren Malone, Sarah V L Marriott, Giles Newton‐Howes, Shaeda Simmonds, Peter Tyrer |
| Abstract |
Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings, underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 27% |
| Psychology | 47 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,894,945
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,393
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,547
of 78,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.