| Title |
Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000324.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petra J Hajenius, Femke Mol, Ben Willem J Mol, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Willem M Ankum, Fulco Van der Veen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 398 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 96 | 24% |
| Unknown | 73 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 213 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 5% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,315,638
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,929
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,403
of 174,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.