| Title |
Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000409.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Ann O'Brien, Stephen Rogers, Gro Jamtvedt, Andrew D Oxman, Jan Odgaard‐Jensen, Doris Tove Kristoffersen, Louise Forsetlund, Daryl Bainbridge, Nick Freemantle, Dave Davis, R. Brian Haynes, Emma Harvey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 614 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 118 | 18% |
| Researcher | 106 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 15% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 157 | 24% |
| Unknown | 105 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 265 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 8% |
| Psychology | 48 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 86 | 13% |
| Unknown | 133 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,262,154
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,631
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,357
of 90,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.