| Title |
Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000503.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 62 | 22% |
| Unknown | 71 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 85 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,617,762
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,433
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,049
of 372,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.