↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Trophic feedings for parenterally fed infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Trophic feedings for parenterally fed infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1997
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyson, JE, Kennedy, KA

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 15 79%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Unknown 15 79%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,468,944
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,950
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,427
of 31,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.