| Title |
Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000938.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michel Boulvain, Jim G Thornton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Honduras | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 27 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,671,481
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,558
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,443
of 426,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.