↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manual therapy for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
27 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
Title
Manual therapy for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001002.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria A Hondras, Klaus Linde, Arthur P Jones

Abstract

A variety of manual therapies with similar postulated biologic mechanisms of action are commonly used to treat patients with asthma. Manual therapy practitioners are also varied, including physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, chiropractic and osteopathic physicians. A systematic review across disciplines is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 294 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Researcher 20 7%
Other 16 5%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 106 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 111 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,271,164
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,674
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,649
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.