| Title |
Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001087.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Murphy S, Irving CB, Adams CE, Driver R |
| Abstract |
A particularly difficult challenge for community treatment of people with serious mental illnesses is the delivery of an acceptable level of care during the acute phases of severe mental illness. Crisis intervention models of care were developed as a possible solution. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 26% |
| Psychology | 24 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,336,067
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,933
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,414
of 163,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.