↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
608 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001139.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pennick, Victoria, Liddle, Sarah D, Victoria Pennick, Sarah D Liddle

Abstract

More than two-thirds of pregnant women experience low-back pain (LBP) and almost one-fifth experience pelvic pain. Pain increases with advancing pregnancy and interferes with work, daily activities and sleep.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 592 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 18%
Student > Bachelor 96 16%
Researcher 43 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 7%
Other 132 22%
Unknown 146 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 207 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 119 20%
Sports and Recreations 26 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 4%
Psychology 16 3%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 167 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,080,683
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,186
of 12,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,978
of 210,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.