↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mycobacterium vaccae immunotherapy for treating tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Mycobacterium vaccae immunotherapy for treating tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy de Bruyn, Paul Garner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,943
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,542
of 128,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.