| Title |
Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001287.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phillippa Poole, Kavin Sathananthan, Rebecca Fortescue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 22 | 34% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Cabo Verde | 1 | 2% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 2% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 342 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 16% |
| Unknown | 137 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 151 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#731,092
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,366
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,960
of 365,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.