| Title |
Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001308.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila A Wallace, Brenda Roe, Kate Williams, Mary Palmer |
| Abstract |
Urinary incontinence is a common and distressing problem. Bladder training aims to increase the interval between voids and is widely used for the treatment of urinary incontinence. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,803
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,996
of 150,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.