↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Serenoa repens for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
44 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Serenoa repens for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001423.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Va Franco, Leonel Trivisonno, Nadia J Sgarbossa, Gustavo Ariel Alvez, Cecilia Fieiras, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Jae Hung Jung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,256,179
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,661
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,410
of 378,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.