| Title |
Token economy for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001473 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom McMonagle, Alec Sultana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,090,530
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,684
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,872
of 39,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.