↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for ingrowing toenails

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for ingrowing toenails
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001541.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Just AH Eekhof, Bart Van Wijk, Arie Knuistingh Neven, Johannes C van der Wouden

Abstract

Ingrowing toenails are a common problem in which part of the nail penetrates the skinfold alongside the nail, creating a painful area. Different non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails are available, but there is no consensus about a standard first-choice treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 270 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Postgraduate 29 11%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 76 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Psychology 8 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 85 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,295,933
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,716
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,433
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.