| Title |
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001800.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grace Dibben, James Faulkner, Neil Oldridge, Karen Rees, David R Thompson, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Rod S Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 27% |
| Spain | 10 | 20% |
| Greece | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 879 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 874 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 11% |
| Researcher | 62 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 165 | 19% |
| Unknown | 335 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 202 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 138 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 48 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 32 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 9% |
| Unknown | 363 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#402,596
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#703
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,192
of 444,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.