| Title |
Non‐invasive physical treatments for chronic/recurrent headache
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001878.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gert Brønfort, Mitchell Haas, Roni L Evans, Charles H Goldsmith, Willem JJ Assendelft, Lex M Bouter |
| Abstract |
Non-invasive physical treatments are often used to treat common types of chronic/recurrent headache. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 70 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,303,192
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,599
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,724
of 247,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.