| Title |
Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002008.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Baldwin, Christine Elizabeth Weekes |
| Abstract |
Disease-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of people in hospital and the community. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested as the initial approach for managing disease-related malnutrition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 412 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 10% |
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 100 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Psychology | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Unknown | 121 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,811,306
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,625
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,605
of 136,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.