↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Permissive hypercapnia for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Permissive hypercapnia for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul G Woodgate, Mark W Davies

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Unspecified 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 49 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,122
of 42,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.