| Title |
Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002198.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Ali K Motamedi, Nicole T Mak, Carl J Brown, Manoj J Raval, Ahmer A Karimuddin, Dean Giustini, Paul Terry Phang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 24 | 55% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 24 | 55% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,010,525
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,113
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,114
of 385,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.