| Title |
Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002211.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren K Pinder, Helena Wilson, Malcolm P Hilton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 28% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 41% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,373,072
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,570
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,033
of 119,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.