↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for bleeding oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for bleeding oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002233.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gennaro D'Amico, Luigi Pagliaro, Giada Pietrosi, Ilaria Tarantino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,626,132
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,741
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,086
of 110,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.