| Title |
Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002255.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicki Flenady, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Dimitri NM Papatsonis, Owen M Stock, Linda Murray, Luke A Jardine, Bruno Carbonne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 564 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 12% |
| Researcher | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 92 | 16% |
| Unknown | 165 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 211 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 11% |
| Psychology | 23 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 10% |
| Unknown | 189 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,083,961
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,191
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,380
of 242,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.