↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for bullous pemphigoid
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002292.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gudula Kirtschig, Philippa Middleton, Cathy Bennett, Dedee F Murrell, Fenella Wojnarowska, Nonhlanhla P Khumalo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 66 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 72 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,633,591
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,742
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,703
of 108,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.