| Title |
Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002296 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alaa Rostom, Catherine Dube, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Emilie Jolicoeur, Jessie McGowan, Angel Lanas, Eleanor Rushton, Tushar Shukla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 45% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,873,814
of 25,269,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,086
of 13,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,855
of 50,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,269,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.