↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002303.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Andreia de Moraes Silva, Andrea Nelson, Sally Em Bell-Syer, Seleno G de Jesus-Silva, Fausto Miranda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,562,137
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,189
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,540
of 307,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.