Title |
Intra‐pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus placebo, or a different fibrinolytic agent, in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002312.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emile S Altmann, Iain Crossingham, Stephen Wilson, Huw R Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 9% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
Researcher | 15 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 79 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 32% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 87 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,513,206
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,089
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,210
of 378,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.